How to implement a SETable object

Finally, the only remaining area to cover is that of setting data - the handling of SNMPSET. Particular care should be taken here for two reasons.

Firstly, any errors in the earlier sections can have limited effect. The worst that is likely to happen is that the agent will either return invalid information, or possibly crash. Either way, this is unlikely to affect the operation of the workstation as a whole. If there are problems in the writing routine, the results could be catastrophic (particularly if writing data directly into kernel memory).

Secondly, this is the least well understood area of the agent, at least by the author. There are relatively few variables that are defined as READ-WRITE in the relevant MIBs, and even fewer that have actually been implemented as such. I'm therefore describing this from a combination of my understanding of how SETs ought to work, personal experience of very simple SET handling and what's actually been done by others (which do not necessarily coincide).

There are also subtle differences between the setting of simple scalar variables (or individual entries within a table), and the creation of a new row within a table. This will therefore be considered separately.

With these caveats, and a healthy dose of caution, let us proceed. Note that the UCD-SNMP development team can accept no responsibility for any damage or loss resulting from either following or ignoring the information presented here. You coded it - you fix it!

N.B: The API for the write routine changed slightly between the 3.x and 4.x releases of the UCD agent. In particular, the value to be set was still ASN1-encoded in the 3.x agent, but was directly available as a normal value in the 4.x line. This was a side effect of other internal changes, but was also felt to provide a significantly easier environment with which to work. We apologise for the inconvenience, but refunds are not available :-)

Write routine

The heart of SET handling is the write_method parameter from the variable handling routine. This is a pointer to the relevant routine for setting the variable in question. Mib2c will generate one such routine for each setable variable. This routine should be declared using the template

	int
	write_variable(
	   int      action,
	   u_char   *var_val,
	   u_char   var_val_type,
	   int      var_val_len,
	   u_char   *statP,
	   oid      *name,
	   int      name_len );

Most of these parameters are fairly self explanatory:
The last two hold the OID to be set, just as was passed to the main variable routine.

The second, third and fourth parameters provide information about the new desired value, both the type, value and length. This is very similar to the way that results are returned from the main variable routine.

The return value of the routine is simply an indication of whether the current stage of the SET was successful or not. We'll come back to this in a minute. Note that it is the responsibility of this routine to check that the OID and value provided are appropriate for the variable being implemented. This includes (but is not limited to) checking:

• the OID is recognised as one this routine can handle
  (this should be true if the routine only handles the one variable, and there are no errors in the main variable routine or driving code, but it does no harm to check).
• the value requested is the correct type expected for this OID
• the value requested is appropriate for this OID
  (within particular ranges, suitable length, etc, etc)

There are two parameters remaining to be considered.

The fifth parameter, statP, is the value that would be returned from a GET request on this particular variable. It could be used to check that the requested new value is consistent with the current state, but its main use is to denote that a new table row is being created. In most cases (particularly when dealing with scalar values or single elements of tables), you can normally simply ignore this parameter.

Actions

The final parameter to consider is the first one - action. To understand this, it's necessary to know a bit about how SETs are implemented.
The design of SNMP calls for all variables in a SET request to be done "as if simultaneously" - i.e. they should all succeed or all fail. However, in practise, the variables are handled in succession. Thus, if one fails, it must be possible to "undo" any changes made to the other variables in the request.
This is a well understood requirement in the database world, and is usually implemented using a "multi-stage commit". This is certainly the mechanism expected within the SNMP community (and has been made explicit in the work of the AgentX extensibility group). In other words, the routine to handle setting a variable will be called more than once, and the routine must be able to perform the appropriate actions depending on how far through the process we currently are. This is determined by the value of the action parameter.

This is implemented using three basic phases:

RESERVE is used to check the syntax of all the variables provided, that the values being set are sensible and consistent, and to allocate any resources required for performing the SET. After this stage, the expectation is that the SET ought to succeed, though this is not guaranteed.
(In fact, with the UCD agent, this is done in two passes - RESERVE1, and RESERVE2, to allow for dependencies between variables).

If any of these calls fail (in either pass) the write routines are called again with the FREE action, to release any resources that have been allocated. The agent will then return a failure response to the requesting application.

Assuming that the RESERVE phase was successful, the next stage is indicated by the action value ACTION. This is used to actually implement the set operation. However, this must either be done into temporary (persistent) storage, or the previous value stored in a similar way, in case any of the subsequent ACTION calls fail. This can be seen in the example module, where both write routines have static 'old' variables, to hold the previous value of the relevant object.

If the ACTION phase does fail (for example due to an apparently valid, but unacceptable value, or an unforeseen problem), then the list of write routines are called again, with the UNDO action. This requires the routine to reset the value that was changed to its previous value (assuming it was actually changed), and then to release any resources that had been allocated. As with the FREE phase, the agent will then return an indication of the error to the requesting application.

Only once the ACTION phase has completed successfully, can the final COMMIT phase be run. This is used to complete any writes that were done into temporary storage, and then release any allocated resources. Note that all the code in this phase should be "safe" code that cannot possibly fail (cue hysterical laughter). The whole intent of the ACTION/COMMIT division is that all of the fallible code should be done in the ACTION phase, so that it can be backed out if necessary.

Table row creation

What about creating new rows in a table, I hear you ask. Good Question. This case can often be detected by the fact that a GET request would have failed, and hence the fifth parameter, statP, will be null. This contrasts with changing the values of an element of an existing row, when the statP parameter would hold the previous value.

The details of precisely how to create a new row will clearly depend on the underlying format of the table. However, one implementation strategy would be as follows:

• The first column object to be SET would return a null value from the var_name routine. This null statP parameter would be the signal to create a new temporary instance of the underlying data structure, filled with dummy values.
• Subsequent column objects would return pointers to the appropriate field of this new data structure from the var_name routine, which would then be filled in by the write routine.
• Once all the necessary fields had been SET, the completed temporary instance could be moved into the "standard" structure (or copied, or otherwise used to set things up appropriately).

However, this is purely a theoretical strategy, and has not been tried by the author. No guarantees are given as to whether this would actually work. There are also questions regarding how to handle incomplete or overlapping SET requests. Anyone who has experience of doing this, please get in touch!

---

And that's it. Congratulations for getting this far. If you understand everything that's been said, then you now know as much as the rest of us about the inner workings of the UCD-SNMP agent. (Well, very nearly).
All that remains is to try putting this into practise. Good luck!

And if you've found this helpful, gifts of money, chocolate, alcohol, and above all feedback, would be most appreciated :-)

---

Copyright 1999 - D.T.Shield. Not to be distributed without the explicit permission of the author. [an error occurred while processing this directive]