Talk:Administrative Meetings - Revision history

Wes at 16:33, 6 February 2007

2007-02-06T16:33:15Z

Wes at 00:34, 6 February 2007

2007-02-06T00:34:50Z

Dts12 at 22:51, 5 February 2007

2007-02-05T22:51:36Z

Wes at 22:00, 5 February 2007

2007-02-05T22:00:28Z

Wes at 21:59, 5 February 2007

2007-02-05T21:59:02Z

Dts12: Policy re new discussion topics

2007-02-05T21:39:27Z

Policy re new discussion topics

New page

Qn:
Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the
"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 6 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions. I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works. I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start. That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course - [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)		::I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions. I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works. I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start. That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course - [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)
	:::Well, my point wasn't that you need to. My point was more if I died you're not left in a lurch and I'm not trying to do a hostile take over of the pages. I do think, however, this is one area that needs to be more carefully controlled as it represents our decisions on things as well as has a direct effect on our meetings, past, etc. Hence the reason I think the pages should be carefully controlled and maintained (by me). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 16:34, 5 February 2007 (PST)		:::Well, my point wasn't that you need to. My point was more if I died you're not left in a lurch and I'm not trying to do a hostile take over of the pages. I do think, however, this is one area that needs to be more carefully controlled as it represents our decisions on things as well as has a direct effect on our meetings, past, etc. Hence the reason I think the pages should be carefully controlled and maintained (by me). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 16:34, 5 February 2007 (PST)
		+	::::Per discussion on mailing list, all pages unprotected again for maximum user contribution. [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 08:33, 6 February 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 6 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually... I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused. Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)		:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually... I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused. Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)
	::I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions. I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works. I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start. That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course - [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)		::I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions. I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works. I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start. That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course - [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)
		+	:::Well, my point wasn't that you need to. My point was more if I died you're not left in a lurch and I'm not trying to do a hostile take over of the pages. I do think, however, this is one area that needs to be more carefully controlled as it represents our decisions on things as well as has a direct effect on our meetings, past, etc. Hence the reason I think the pages should be carefully controlled and maintained (by me). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 16:34, 5 February 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 5 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)		"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)
	:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually... I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused. Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)		:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually... I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused. Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). [[User:Wes\|Wes]] 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)
		+	::I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions. I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works. I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start. That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course - [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the
 "Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)
-:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually...  I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused.  Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency).
+:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually...  I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused.  Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). [[User:Wes|Wes]] 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 5 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the		Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the
	"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)		"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12\|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)
		+	:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually... I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused. Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency).