+<!-- NB:
+ There is a mismatch between the template numbering
+ for this entry, and the FAQ entries that refer to it.
+ This follows a re-ordering of the entries in the
+ Applications section.
+ -->
This is actually the same as the previous question - it just isn't
This is actually the same as the previous question - it just isn't
particularly obvious, particularly when using SNMPv1. A typical
particularly obvious, particularly when using SNMPv1. A typical
example of this effect would be
example of this effect would be
Exception encountered, of type "Error"