Difference between revisions of "Notes20120910"

From Net-SNMP Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
*** '''looks better''' -- nba: should remove conversion to SVN
 
*** '''looks better''' -- nba: should remove conversion to SVN
 
** SourceForge Hosted Apps
 
** SourceForge Hosted Apps
 +
*** will drop from running agenda items
 
** Switch to [http://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/Features/ Allura]?
 
** Switch to [http://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/Features/ Allura]?
 +
*** '''Wes will find an example project so we can look at it'''
 +
*** magfr> Does it manage to add In-Reply-To headers to the mails? If so then I am in favour of it.
 
** Adding a "this is an old relesae" header to the README and other files for older branches?
 
** Adding a "this is an old relesae" header to the README and other files for older branches?
 +
*** Wes is for it.
 +
*** file conflicts could be a problem though
 +
*** not sure if it'll help a huge amount though.
 
** public Google+ hangout?
 
** public Google+ hangout?
 +
*** probably not worth the effort
 
* Technical
 
* Technical
 
** Coverity scan results
 
** Coverity scan results
 +
*** drop from running agenda items
 
* Roundtable
 
* Roundtable
 +
** Wes: 5.7.2

Latest revision as of 19:29, 10 September 2012

Previous: 2012-07-23
Next: 2012-10-??

This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2012-09-10.

Date and Time: 2012-09-10 19:00 UTC

  • Next Date
    • Oct 22nd
  • Releases
    • 5.7.2 -- Wes
      • rc2 is out; will need to do an rc3 probably
      • rstory: disman is broken it seems: it looks like the code to retrieve vars is munging the type.. so tests fail because of a bad type. file to check is agent/mibgroup/disman/event/mteTrigger.c
  • Administrative
    • Git
      • will drop from running-agenda-items
    • Wiki Main Page
      • looks better -- nba: should remove conversion to SVN
    • SourceForge Hosted Apps
      • will drop from running agenda items
    • Switch to Allura?
      • Wes will find an example project so we can look at it
      • magfr> Does it manage to add In-Reply-To headers to the mails? If so then I am in favour of it.
    • Adding a "this is an old relesae" header to the README and other files for older branches?
      • Wes is for it.
      • file conflicts could be a problem though
      • not sure if it'll help a huge amount though.
    • public Google+ hangout?
      • probably not worth the effort
  • Technical
    • Coverity scan results
      • drop from running agenda items
  • Roundtable
    • Wes: 5.7.2