Difference between revisions of "Notes20121022"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Reminder for Fall to Spring - use "time=20" for end of DST, and for Spring to Fall use "time=19" --> | <!-- Reminder for Fall to Spring - use "time=20" for end of DST, and for Spring to Fall use "time=19" --> | ||
<!-- US Daylight savings times: http://www.timetemperature.com/tzus/daylight_saving_time.shtml --> | <!-- US Daylight savings times: http://www.timetemperature.com/tzus/daylight_saving_time.shtml --> | ||
| − | {{meetingtime|time=19|year=2012|month=10|day=22|nextyear= | + | {{meetingtime|time=19|year=2012|month=10|day=22|nextyear=2013|nextmonth=01|nextday=07|prevyear=2012|prevmonth=09|prevday=10}} |
* Next Date | * Next Date | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** Next up: '''from 20120723: concentrate on patches/bugs instead of a release''' | ** Next up: '''from 20120723: concentrate on patches/bugs instead of a release''' | ||
* Administrative | * Administrative | ||
| − | ** wiki issues | + | ** PERSIST until fixed: wiki issues |
*** '''mostly fixed now; confirmededit (ie, captchas) so the login page is broken''' | *** '''mostly fixed now; confirmededit (ie, captchas) so the login page is broken''' | ||
*** '''during the 30 minutes of off time, 4 spam accounts were created''' | *** '''during the 30 minutes of off time, 4 spam accounts were created''' | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*** '''some discussion about how old releases are a pain in the first place''' | *** '''some discussion about how old releases are a pain in the first place''' | ||
* Technical | * Technical | ||
| − | ** Time kill off redundant modules? | + | ** PERSIST: Time kill off redundant modules? |
*** notes on things that may need (re)moving: | *** notes on things that may need (re)moving: | ||
**** ucd-snmp/lmSensors <> ucd-snmp/lmsensorsMib | **** ucd-snmp/lmSensors <> ucd-snmp/lmsensorsMib | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
**** '''hardaker: the goal was to have newer code "stage" but the reality is that's a pain. We shouldn't be making users have to know. *we* should have the pain. Thus, when we rewrite I think the right thing to do is rewrite in place and optionally move the older code to obsolete/ so that it can be activated if the newer code fails.''' | **** '''hardaker: the goal was to have newer code "stage" but the reality is that's a pain. We shouldn't be making users have to know. *we* should have the pain. Thus, when we rewrite I think the right thing to do is rewrite in place and optionally move the older code to obsolete/ so that it can be activated if the newer code fails.''' | ||
* Roundtable | * Roundtable | ||
| + | ** me: coordinating allura, bugs?, and unknown | ||
| + | ** trogl: hopefully more oracle/sun gear to work on soon. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 30 November 2012
Net-SNMP Meeting
2012-10-22
2012-10-22
| Previous: | 2012-09-10 |
| Next: | 2013-01-07 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2012-10-22.
Date and Time: 2012-10-22 19:00 UTC
- Next Date
- Nov 26th
- Releases
- 5.7.2 -- Wes
- is out the door
- Next up: from 20120723: concentrate on patches/bugs instead of a release
- 5.7.2 -- Wes
- Administrative
- PERSIST until fixed: wiki issues
- mostly fixed now; confirmededit (ie, captchas) so the login page is broken
- during the 30 minutes of off time, 4 spam accounts were created
- Wiki Main Page
- good: remove from future agendas
- PERSIST: Switch to Allura?
- rough consensus to switch
- announce with switch in 2 weeks?
- PERSIST: Adding a "this is an old release" header to the README and other files for older branches?
- consensus to add a note
- consider adding a runtime or configure time check?
- runtime: daemons
- some discussion about how old releases are a pain in the first place
- PERSIST until fixed: wiki issues
- Technical
- PERSIST: Time kill off redundant modules?
- notes on things that may need (re)moving:
- ucd-snmp/lmSensors <> ucd-snmp/lmsensorsMib
- ucd-snmp/memory_XXX <> hardware/data_acces/memory_xxx
- disman/expression <> disman/expression-mib (which is better)?
- disman/event <> disman/event-mib (which is better)?
- mibII/ipCidrRouteTable <> ip-forward-mib/ipCidrRouteTable
- Conclusions from the discussion:
- good idea in general
- needs a wider discussion on -coders
- move to an obsolete/ folder for a release on two
- some unresolved discussions about weather and how-to warn about new versions
- hardaker: the goal was to have newer code "stage" but the reality is that's a pain. We shouldn't be making users have to know. *we* should have the pain. Thus, when we rewrite I think the right thing to do is rewrite in place and optionally move the older code to obsolete/ so that it can be activated if the newer code fails.
- notes on things that may need (re)moving:
- PERSIST: Time kill off redundant modules?
- Roundtable
- me: coordinating allura, bugs?, and unknown
- trogl: hopefully more oracle/sun gear to work on soon.
