Difference between revisions of "Notes20081006"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{meetingtime|time=19|nextyear=2008|nextmonth= | + | {{meetingtime|time=19|nextyear=2008|nextmonth=11|nextday=10|prevyear=2008|prevmonth=09|prevday=15|year=2008|day=06|month=10}} |
* Next Meeting Date | * Next Meeting Date | ||
| + | ** '''Nov 10th selected''' | ||
* Coding Issues | * Coding Issues | ||
** configure re-structuring | ** configure re-structuring | ||
| − | ** autoconf 2. | + | *** '''Dave has been plugging away and making good progress.''' |
| + | *** '''"What I would *like* to do, is get things to a position whereby we can use the results of configure to decide what MIb modules to include."'''- | ||
| + | *** ''should we consider automake?'' | ||
| + | **** '''Tabled until November''' | ||
| + | **** ''Redaing material: "net-snmp build system anomalities" (18 Sept -coders)'' | ||
| + | ** autoconf 2.63 | ||
| + | *** '''Also tabled till next time until Thomas is around and we discuss automake''' | ||
** Patch [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=312694&group_id=12694&aid=1627049 1627049] was applied (dts12) but not closed? | ** Patch [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=312694&group_id=12694&aid=1627049 1627049] was applied (dts12) but not closed? | ||
| + | *** '''Issues need to be moved to bugs and patch closed''' | ||
** current name (local) vs new (tsm) | ** current name (local) vs new (tsm) | ||
| + | *** '''wes explained the issue''' | ||
| + | *** '''lots of discussion surrounding whether to leave snmplocalsm.c around for a while or not. in the end, delete it. just remove from help in branches.''' | ||
| + | ** context engineid discovery mechanism feedback | ||
| + | *** '''general consensus: blech, but want to read the patch before complaining more than that; will discuss again in November.''' | ||
* Administrative | * Administrative | ||
** [http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=3358&page&replies=1 Centralized mediawiki] | ** [http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=3358&page&replies=1 Centralized mediawiki] | ||
| + | *** '''Wes played with it in another project and it doesn't offer any benefits really (speed is about the same).''' | ||
* Round Table | * Round Table | ||
| + | ** reminder about the [[BugBash]] next week | ||
| + | ** Wes: mostly discussed above already. | ||
| + | ** magfr: Will try to move in some more modernized mibs. The _5_5 name do have drawacks but I can't figure out a better one. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:06, 6 October 2008
Net-SNMP Meeting
2008-10-06
2008-10-06
| Previous: | 2008-09-15 |
| Next: | 2008-11-10 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2008-10-06.
Date and Time: 2008-10-06 19:00 UTC
- Next Meeting Date
- Nov 10th selected
- Coding Issues
- configure re-structuring
- Dave has been plugging away and making good progress.
- "What I would *like* to do, is get things to a position whereby we can use the results of configure to decide what MIb modules to include."-
- should we consider automake?
- Tabled until November
- Redaing material: "net-snmp build system anomalities" (18 Sept -coders)
- autoconf 2.63
- Also tabled till next time until Thomas is around and we discuss automake
- Patch 1627049 was applied (dts12) but not closed?
- Issues need to be moved to bugs and patch closed
- current name (local) vs new (tsm)
- wes explained the issue
- lots of discussion surrounding whether to leave snmplocalsm.c around for a while or not. in the end, delete it. just remove from help in branches.
- context engineid discovery mechanism feedback
- general consensus: blech, but want to read the patch before complaining more than that; will discuss again in November.
- configure re-structuring
- Administrative
- Centralized mediawiki
- Wes played with it in another project and it doesn't offer any benefits really (speed is about the same).
- Centralized mediawiki
- Round Table
- reminder about the BugBash next week
- Wes: mostly discussed above already.
- magfr: Will try to move in some more modernized mibs. The _5_5 name do have drawacks but I can't figure out a better one.
