Difference between revisions of "Notes20090105"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*** '''general agreement that it's both better (well done Dave) and sufficient for 5.5''' | *** '''general agreement that it's both better (well done Dave) and sufficient for 5.5''' | ||
** autoconf 2.63 | ** autoconf 2.63 | ||
| + | *** '''tanders installed it into trunk before the holidays, so it's in place now''' | ||
** discussion surrounding automake | ** discussion surrounding automake | ||
| + | *** '''Wes will send note to -admins asking for people who want to stand up as 'its good and we should do it' representatives''' | ||
** engineid discovery mechanism | ** engineid discovery mechanism | ||
| + | *** '''No one wanted to hold discussion about it''' | ||
| + | *** '''Future additions to the agenda about it welcome, but otherwise discussion dropped''' | ||
** coverity | ** coverity | ||
| + | *** Wes delivers long report: | ||
| + | [12:38] <hardaker> coverity: | ||
| + | [12:39] <hardaker> I attended a conference call in december? about it. | ||
| + | [12:39] <hardaker> they're making lots of changes. | ||
| + | [12:39] <hardaker> they have a self-build system that lets you submit results to scan from any OS (pretty much) | ||
| + | [12:39] <hardaker> I asked lots of questions and it was a good conference call. | ||
| + | [12:39] <hardaker> that being said, since then: | ||
| + | [12:40] <hardaker> 1) I asked for a new project (unrelated to net-snmp) to be added and they said they would. So I sent the mail they requested and got no response. | ||
| + | [12:40] <hardaker> 2) I submitted a self-build on my F9 system per their instructions and it didn't appear in their runs system. | ||
| + | [12:40] <hardaker> 3) I sent them mail asking for help about where my self-build results were supposed to be seen and got no response. again. | ||
| + | [12:40] <hardaker> they were sure that their responsiveness was improving, but I haven't seen signs of it. | ||
| + | [12:41] <hardaker> I suspect I just thought of a potential issue for #2 today that may have been the problem and I'll try submitting a new build later this week to see if I can correct it. | ||
| + | [12:41] <hardaker> beyond that, this is just a report and I have no discussion items per say. | ||
| + | ** libtool 2.2.4 | ||
| + | *** '''magfr (thank you!) upgraded libtool to 2.2.4.''' | ||
| + | *** '''macros moved to the m4 directory''' | ||
| + | *** ''no longer checks for a fortran compiler'' | ||
| + | *** ''slight discussion about possibly moving m4 and configure.d to subdirectories, but no one cared but Wes... dropped'' | ||
* Round Table | * Round Table | ||
| + | ** '''Wes is working on DTLS (mostly done) and SSH (needs a new application for tying sshd to snmpd)''' | ||
| + | ** '''dtls12: nothing recently''' | ||
| + | ** '''magfr: dup_nword, skip_nword, rework of copy_nword''' | ||
Latest revision as of 20:57, 5 January 2009
Net-SNMP Meeting
2009-01-05
2009-01-05
| Previous: | 2008-12-15 |
| Next: | 2009-02-02 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2009-01-05.
Date and Time: 2009-01-05 20:00 UTC
- Next meeting date
- February 2nd
- Release issues
- Upcoming releases
- 5.3.3 - Robert?
- Robert agreed. "it's just running a few scripts, right? how hard can it be?"
- roughly end-of-feb time-frame with 2-3 weeks for pre1-pre2 and 2-3 for rc1-rc2
- 5.5 - Wes
- Will start right after 5.3.3 is out the door. Likely early March.
- Coding issues
- bug bashing report
- dts12 will run another on bugs this time (as opposed to patches)
- will shoot for Feb 16th
- might want someone else to take over after this next one
- autoconf rehash/rework
- dtls12 hasn't done anything recently about it
- wes had issues getting autoconf to force rebuild from the new files
- general agreement that it's both better (well done Dave) and sufficient for 5.5
- autoconf 2.63
- tanders installed it into trunk before the holidays, so it's in place now
- discussion surrounding automake
- Wes will send note to -admins asking for people who want to stand up as 'its good and we should do it' representatives
- engineid discovery mechanism
- No one wanted to hold discussion about it
- Future additions to the agenda about it welcome, but otherwise discussion dropped
- coverity
- Wes delivers long report:
- bug bashing report
[12:38] <hardaker> coverity: [12:39] <hardaker> I attended a conference call in december? about it. [12:39] <hardaker> they're making lots of changes. [12:39] <hardaker> they have a self-build system that lets you submit results to scan from any OS (pretty much) [12:39] <hardaker> I asked lots of questions and it was a good conference call. [12:39] <hardaker> that being said, since then: [12:40] <hardaker> 1) I asked for a new project (unrelated to net-snmp) to be added and they said they would. So I sent the mail they requested and got no response. [12:40] <hardaker> 2) I submitted a self-build on my F9 system per their instructions and it didn't appear in their runs system. [12:40] <hardaker> 3) I sent them mail asking for help about where my self-build results were supposed to be seen and got no response. again. [12:40] <hardaker> they were sure that their responsiveness was improving, but I haven't seen signs of it. [12:41] <hardaker> I suspect I just thought of a potential issue for #2 today that may have been the problem and I'll try submitting a new build later this week to see if I can correct it. [12:41] <hardaker> beyond that, this is just a report and I have no discussion items per say.
- libtool 2.2.4
- magfr (thank you!) upgraded libtool to 2.2.4.
- macros moved to the m4 directory
- no longer checks for a fortran compiler
- slight discussion about possibly moving m4 and configure.d to subdirectories, but no one cared but Wes... dropped
- libtool 2.2.4
- Round Table
- Wes is working on DTLS (mostly done) and SSH (needs a new application for tying sshd to snmpd)
- dtls12: nothing recently
- magfr: dup_nword, skip_nword, rework of copy_nword
