Difference between revisions of "Notes20091012"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** dropping 64bit support of OIDs -- magfr | ** dropping 64bit support of OIDs -- magfr | ||
* Testing infrastructure and supported releases | * Testing infrastructure and supported releases | ||
| + | ** Wes thinks make test should prompt users to submit their data. | ||
| + | *** captures num pass/num failed | ||
| + | *** captures tests that fail | ||
| + | *** submits to CGI script to collect and display in table. | ||
| + | **** high level table: number of hosts with complete success vs number run per arch | ||
| + | **** click on given arch for num pass/fail per test itself | ||
| + | *** submission over CGI POST vs email: | ||
| + | **** rstory/magfr: email would be easier? just pipe to sendmail? | ||
| + | ***** (wes disagrees as it relies on sendmail working, which isn't always safe IMHO) | ||
| + | **** magfr: possible issue with CGI proxies? | ||
| + | ***** (wes disagrees: most forced inline proxies should pass it without user awareness) | ||
* Future Directions | * Future Directions | ||
** What's next? | ** What's next? | ||
* Other Issues | * Other Issues | ||
* Round Table | * Round Table | ||
| + | ** Wes: 5.5 is out, hopes to do more DTLS in the future | ||
| + | ** rstory: nothing to report | ||
| + | ** magfr: accumulated patches to trickle in | ||
Latest revision as of 19:28, 12 October 2009
Net-SNMP Meeting
2009-10-12
2009-10-12
| Previous: | 2009-08-10 |
| Next: | 2009-11-16 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2009-10-12.
Date and Time: 2009-10-12 19:00 UTC
Agenda
- Next Meeting Date
- Nov 16th, 2009
- Releases
- 5.5 - Wes
- Wes: 5.5 is out; need more binaries
- 5.2.x -- dts12
- should be started? Dave's not here (man)
- 5.4.x -- dts12
- should be started? Dave's not here (man)
- 5.5 - Wes
- Coding Issues
- dropping 64bit support of OIDs -- magfr
- Testing infrastructure and supported releases
- Wes thinks make test should prompt users to submit their data.
- captures num pass/num failed
- captures tests that fail
- submits to CGI script to collect and display in table.
- high level table: number of hosts with complete success vs number run per arch
- click on given arch for num pass/fail per test itself
- submission over CGI POST vs email:
- rstory/magfr: email would be easier? just pipe to sendmail?
- (wes disagrees as it relies on sendmail working, which isn't always safe IMHO)
- magfr: possible issue with CGI proxies?
- (wes disagrees: most forced inline proxies should pass it without user awareness)
- rstory/magfr: email would be easier? just pipe to sendmail?
- Wes thinks make test should prompt users to submit their data.
- Future Directions
- What's next?
- Other Issues
- Round Table
- Wes: 5.5 is out, hopes to do more DTLS in the future
- rstory: nothing to report
- magfr: accumulated patches to trickle in
