Difference between revisions of "Notes20101011"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Reminder for Fall 2010 - will need to use "time=20" to allow for non DST --> | <!-- Reminder for Fall 2010 - will need to use "time=20" to allow for non DST --> | ||
− | {{meetingtime|time=19|year=2010|month=10|day=11|nextyear=2010|nextmonth=11|nextday= | + | {{meetingtime|time=19|year=2010|month=10|day=11|nextyear=2010|nextmonth=11|nextday=29|prevyear=2010|prevmonth=09|prevday=20}} |
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Next Meeting Date | * Next Meeting Date | ||
+ | ** '''November 29th''' | ||
* Releases | * Releases | ||
** 5.6 | ** 5.6 | ||
+ | *** '''Wes released 5.6 but there are a couple of immediate problems''' | ||
+ | *** Future plans for branching and 5.6.1, etc. | ||
+ | **** '''patches tree created for 5.6''' | ||
+ | **** '''will release 5.6.1 in december''' | ||
+ | **** '''will do in parallel with 5.5.1 due in Jan''' | ||
+ | *** Upload permissions | ||
+ | **** '''dts12: Just a quick note - when creating a release directory, please make sure it's group writable.''' | ||
+ | **** '''the mkdir should possibly go into the release script?''' | ||
+ | *** Binary Release instructions ([[Release_Instructions]]) | ||
+ | **** '''please please please document what you do. The big ones in my mind are solaris and win32.''' | ||
+ | **** '''Include flags used to build with features''' | ||
+ | *** Binary Release MIB modules (e.g. examples) | ||
+ | **** '''what MIB modules are/should be included in binary releases?''' | ||
+ | **** '''stew till next time''' | ||
+ | **** '''document choices in [[Release Instructions]] though''' | ||
** Next branch to target? | ** Next branch to target? | ||
+ | *** '''5.5.1 in January''' | ||
+ | *** '''5.3.4 after that, probably feb or mar''' | ||
* Administrative | * Administrative | ||
+ | ** Release Policy (http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html) | ||
+ | *** '''rcN series generally goes well''' | ||
+ | *** '''preN series is generally ignored in terms of the guidelines; this needs to be fixed''' | ||
+ | *** '''turn around times for a release are far too long''' | ||
+ | *** '''branch should still be created at final''' | ||
+ | *** '''pre-release series *must* get more locked down''' | ||
+ | *** '''policy stays the same. We as a group need to enforce them.''' | ||
+ | *** '''we'll switch to 1-week turn arounds for preN)''' | ||
+ | **** '''if no changes since the last preN then likely do a rc1''' | ||
* Technical | * Technical | ||
** Future and continual discussion topics | ** Future and continual discussion topics | ||
− | *** | + | *** [[Testing Infrastructure]] and unit tests |
+ | **** '''Wes will try to write up more docs and examples''' | ||
+ | **** '''Will be a longer topic next time''' | ||
+ | **** '''please study and review''' | ||
*** build cmake vs ?? | *** build cmake vs ?? | ||
*** streamlined/stripped-down library and agent | *** streamlined/stripped-down library and agent | ||
* Round Table | * Round Table | ||
+ | ** Wes: a reduced and stream-lined code, along with a read-only agent |
Latest revision as of 20:04, 11 October 2010
Net-SNMP Meeting
2010-10-11
2010-10-11
Previous: | 2010-09-20 |
Next: | 2010-11-29 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2010-10-11.
Date and Time: 2010-10-11 19:00 UTC
Agenda
- Next Meeting Date
- November 29th
- Releases
- 5.6
- Wes released 5.6 but there are a couple of immediate problems
- Future plans for branching and 5.6.1, etc.
- patches tree created for 5.6
- will release 5.6.1 in december
- will do in parallel with 5.5.1 due in Jan
- Upload permissions
- dts12: Just a quick note - when creating a release directory, please make sure it's group writable.
- the mkdir should possibly go into the release script?
- Binary Release instructions (Release_Instructions)
- please please please document what you do. The big ones in my mind are solaris and win32.
- Include flags used to build with features
- Binary Release MIB modules (e.g. examples)
- what MIB modules are/should be included in binary releases?
- stew till next time
- document choices in Release Instructions though
- Next branch to target?
- 5.5.1 in January
- 5.3.4 after that, probably feb or mar
- 5.6
- Administrative
- Release Policy (http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html)
- rcN series generally goes well
- preN series is generally ignored in terms of the guidelines; this needs to be fixed
- turn around times for a release are far too long
- branch should still be created at final
- pre-release series *must* get more locked down
- policy stays the same. We as a group need to enforce them.
- we'll switch to 1-week turn arounds for preN)
- if no changes since the last preN then likely do a rc1
- Release Policy (http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html)
- Technical
- Future and continual discussion topics
- Testing Infrastructure and unit tests
- Wes will try to write up more docs and examples
- Will be a longer topic next time
- please study and review
- build cmake vs ??
- streamlined/stripped-down library and agent
- Testing Infrastructure and unit tests
- Future and continual discussion topics
- Round Table
- Wes: a reduced and stream-lined code, along with a read-only agent