Difference between revisions of "Notes20110321"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
(→Agenda) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Reminder for Spring 2011 - will need to use "time=19" to allow for DST --> | <!-- Reminder for Spring 2011 - will need to use "time=19" to allow for DST --> | ||
| − | {{meetingtime|time=20|year=2011|month=03|day=21|nextyear=2011|nextmonth=04|nextday= | + | {{meetingtime|time=20|year=2011|month=03|day=21|nextyear=2011|nextmonth=04|nextday=25|prevyear=2011|prevmonth=02|prevday=21}} |
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** 5.5.1 | ** 5.5.1 | ||
*** '''Done. announcement later today''' | *** '''Done. announcement later today''' | ||
| − | ** 5.3 | + | ** 5.3.4 |
*** '''pre1 done''' | *** '''pre1 done''' | ||
| − | ** 5.4 | + | ** 5.4.4 |
*** '''pre1 done''' | *** '''pre1 done''' | ||
** 5.7 | ** 5.7 | ||
| + | *** '''Wes wants to start in late April''' | ||
| + | *** '''Discussion about which features it would bring''' | ||
| + | *** '''Wes mentions he'll have more than average time to spend on it''' | ||
| + | *** '''consensus-ish to choose 5.7 as ok to start in late April''' | ||
| + | ** Branch Life Times | ||
| + | *** '''with faster life cycles, maintaining branches becomes more of a problem''' | ||
| + | *** '''discussion about policy occurred and will be brought to the list''' | ||
| + | **** '''along with rstory's question about back-porting well tested features to older LTS branches''' | ||
* Administrative | * Administrative | ||
** standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation? | ** standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation? | ||
| + | *** '''yes''' (and Dave volunteers Wes to get it done). | ||
* Technical | * Technical | ||
** [[Testing]] | ** [[Testing]] | ||
| + | *** ''no comments'' | ||
** [[Feature Marking and Selection]] | ** [[Feature Marking and Selection]] | ||
| + | *** ''no comments'' | ||
** IPv6 support | ** IPv6 support | ||
*** --enable-ipv6 vs --enable-transports, etc. | *** --enable-ipv6 vs --enable-transports, etc. | ||
*** default ipv6 on these days? | *** default ipv6 on these days? | ||
| + | *** '''will enable by default on 5.7 onward''' | ||
** Windows Builds | ** Windows Builds | ||
| − | ** RPMs | + | *** '''Dave got helpful hints from Alex''' |
| + | **** '''will post to the wiki''' | ||
| + | ** RPMs, DEBs, and system specific packaging. | ||
| + | *** '''current consensus is to package according to the same packaging that is done on the system itself''' | ||
| + | *** '''users should get packages that replace the existing ones with similar functionality''' | ||
| + | *** '''as nba puts it: If we dont match the distro, we only appeal to those who might as well compile their own''' | ||
** SVN vs GIT | ** SVN vs GIT | ||
*** slow migration proposed last time ; community split between which is better. | *** slow migration proposed last time ; community split between which is better. | ||
| + | **** hardaker: +1 | ||
| + | **** magfr: 0 | ||
| + | **** dts12: would like to know more still and be more comfortable | ||
*** Decision should be aprilish | *** Decision should be aprilish | ||
*** [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dhZ9BXQgc4 good google tech talk about it] | *** [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dhZ9BXQgc4 good google tech talk about it] | ||
* Round Table | * Round Table | ||
| + | ** Wes: scheduled delivery of data via notifications | ||
| + | ** dts12: releases (5.3.4 and 5.4.4) | ||
| + | ** rstory: dtls wrap-up (cookies and testing) | ||
| + | ** nba: playing with netsnmpstat: so that it will work whether you have tcpConnTable, ipv6TcpConnTable or tcpConnectionTable | ||
Latest revision as of 19:00, 25 April 2011
Net-SNMP Meeting
2011-03-21
2011-03-21
| Previous: | 2011-02-21 |
| Next: | 2011-04-25 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2011-03-21.
Date and Time: 2011-03-21 20:00 UTC
Agenda
- Next Meeting
- April 11th
- Releases
- 5.5.1
- Done. announcement later today
- 5.3.4
- pre1 done
- 5.4.4
- pre1 done
- 5.7
- Wes wants to start in late April
- Discussion about which features it would bring
- Wes mentions he'll have more than average time to spend on it
- consensus-ish to choose 5.7 as ok to start in late April
- Branch Life Times
- with faster life cycles, maintaining branches becomes more of a problem
- discussion about policy occurred and will be brought to the list
- along with rstory's question about back-porting well tested features to older LTS branches
- 5.5.1
- Administrative
- standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
- yes (and Dave volunteers Wes to get it done).
- standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
- Technical
- Testing
- no comments
- Feature Marking and Selection
- no comments
- IPv6 support
- --enable-ipv6 vs --enable-transports, etc.
- default ipv6 on these days?
- will enable by default on 5.7 onward
- Windows Builds
- Dave got helpful hints from Alex
- will post to the wiki
- Dave got helpful hints from Alex
- RPMs, DEBs, and system specific packaging.
- current consensus is to package according to the same packaging that is done on the system itself
- users should get packages that replace the existing ones with similar functionality
- as nba puts it: If we dont match the distro, we only appeal to those who might as well compile their own
- SVN vs GIT
- slow migration proposed last time ; community split between which is better.
- hardaker: +1
- magfr: 0
- dts12: would like to know more still and be more comfortable
- Decision should be aprilish
- good google tech talk about it
- slow migration proposed last time ; community split between which is better.
- Testing
- Round Table
- Wes: scheduled delivery of data via notifications
- dts12: releases (5.3.4 and 5.4.4)
- rstory: dtls wrap-up (cookies and testing)
- nba: playing with netsnmpstat: so that it will work whether you have tcpConnTable, ipv6TcpConnTable or tcpConnectionTable
