Difference between revisions of "Notes20110523"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- Reminder for Fall 2011 - will need to use "time=20" to allow for DST --> | <!-- Reminder for Fall 2011 - will need to use "time=20" to allow for DST --> | ||
| − | {{meetingtime|time=19|year=2011|month=05|day=23|nextyear=2011|nextmonth=06|nextday= | + | {{meetingtime|time=19|year=2011|month=05|day=23|nextyear=2011|nextmonth=06|nextday=20|prevyear=2011|prevmonth=04|prevday=25}} |
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Next Meeting | * Next Meeting | ||
| + | ** June 20th | ||
* Releases | * Releases | ||
** 5.3.4 | ** 5.3.4 | ||
| + | *** '''rc1 at the end of the week''' | ||
** 5.4.4 | ** 5.4.4 | ||
| + | *** '''rc1 at the end of the week''' | ||
** 5.7 | ** 5.7 | ||
| + | *** '''pre2 out todayish''' | ||
* Administrative | * Administrative | ||
** Switching to GIT | ** Switching to GIT | ||
| Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
***# switch everything but the 5.{3,4}.4 branches this week, and apply patches from the svn tree later to the git tree after releases are finished. | ***# switch everything but the 5.{3,4}.4 branches this week, and apply patches from the svn tree later to the git tree after releases are finished. | ||
***# delay the switch till after 5.{3,4}.4 final (as long as it's before 5.7). | ***# delay the switch till after 5.{3,4}.4 final (as long as it's before 5.7). | ||
| + | ***#* '''Daves' preference and Wes is fine with it, so we'll go with this choice unless 5.{3,4}.4 drag out too long. | ||
** Bisectability of the SVN/git tree. | ** Bisectability of the SVN/git tree. | ||
| + | *** '''Agreed: We shouldn't push broken commits because it means ''git bisect'' breaks if you can't test the broken code in the middle of a bisect''' | ||
** standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation? | ** standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation? | ||
*** Wes wrote one: [[Please write responses to the mailing lists]] | *** Wes wrote one: [[Please write responses to the mailing lists]] | ||
**** feedback and editing appreciated | **** feedback and editing appreciated | ||
**** start pointing to it? | **** start pointing to it? | ||
| + | ** LTS Timing | ||
| + | *** From last time: 5.4 and 5.7 will be LTS | ||
| + | *** How long is Long? | ||
| + | *** '''Dave's proposal: keep 2 LTS branches active, ensuring at least 5 years. Keep 3 branches otherwise''' | ||
| + | *** Examples: | ||
| + | **** 5.4L, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7L | ||
| + | **** 5.4L, 5.6, 5.7L, 5.8 | ||
| + | **** 5.4L, 5.7L, 5.8, 5.9 | ||
| + | **** 5.7L, 5.8, 5.9, 5.10L | ||
* Technical | * Technical | ||
** the infamous oid typedef issues | ** the infamous oid typedef issues | ||
| + | *** '''5.6.1.1 still scheduled to go out''' | ||
| + | *** '''Should we consider going to a 6.0, where we change all types to match (the biggest becoming all the u_longs used everywhere for ints).''' | ||
| + | **** '''Wes notes that it may be possible to have a injectable handle that swaps types in the middle of a handler chain for legacy code''' | ||
| + | *** '''general discussion tabled for future meetings about 6.0''' | ||
** Windows Builds | ** Windows Builds | ||
*** Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it. | *** Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it. | ||
* Round Table | * Round Table | ||
| + | ** dts12: 5.x.4 | ||
| + | ** hardaker: 5.7 and git | ||
| + | ** bvanassche: wiki pages about git | ||
Latest revision as of 20:07, 23 May 2011
Net-SNMP Meeting
2011-05-23
2011-05-23
| Previous: | 2011-04-25 |
| Next: | 2011-06-20 |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2011-05-23.
Date and Time: 2011-05-23 19:00 UTC
Agenda
- Next Meeting
- June 20th
- Releases
- 5.3.4
- rc1 at the end of the week
- 5.4.4
- rc1 at the end of the week
- 5.7
- pre2 out todayish
- 5.3.4
- Administrative
- Switching to GIT
- Timing choices:
- switch now (ie, this week) for everything
- switch everything but the 5.{3,4}.4 branches this week, and apply patches from the svn tree later to the git tree after releases are finished.
- delay the switch till after 5.{3,4}.4 final (as long as it's before 5.7).
- Daves' preference and Wes is fine with it, so we'll go with this choice unless 5.{3,4}.4 drag out too long.
- Timing choices:
- Bisectability of the SVN/git tree.
- Agreed: We shouldn't push broken commits because it means git bisect breaks if you can't test the broken code in the middle of a bisect
- standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
- Wes wrote one: Please write responses to the mailing lists
- feedback and editing appreciated
- start pointing to it?
- Wes wrote one: Please write responses to the mailing lists
- LTS Timing
- From last time: 5.4 and 5.7 will be LTS
- How long is Long?
- Dave's proposal: keep 2 LTS branches active, ensuring at least 5 years. Keep 3 branches otherwise
- Examples:
- 5.4L, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7L
- 5.4L, 5.6, 5.7L, 5.8
- 5.4L, 5.7L, 5.8, 5.9
- 5.7L, 5.8, 5.9, 5.10L
- Switching to GIT
- Technical
- the infamous oid typedef issues
- 5.6.1.1 still scheduled to go out
- Should we consider going to a 6.0, where we change all types to match (the biggest becoming all the u_longs used everywhere for ints).
- Wes notes that it may be possible to have a injectable handle that swaps types in the middle of a handler chain for legacy code
- general discussion tabled for future meetings about 6.0
- Windows Builds
- Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it.
- the infamous oid typedef issues
- Round Table
- dts12: 5.x.4
- hardaker: 5.7 and git
- bvanassche: wiki pages about git
