Difference between revisions of "Notes20110425"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
** IETF Notes from March IETF | ** IETF Notes from March IETF | ||
*** The [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/eman/charter/ EMAN] working group is working on energy management (battery, power, etc) | *** The [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/eman/charter/ EMAN] working group is working on energy management (battery, power, etc) | ||
− | *** HOST-RESOURCES-MIB update interest | + | *** HOST-RESOURCES-MIB update interest, send notes of broken things in the MIB to Wes. |
** Windows Builds | ** Windows Builds | ||
*** Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it. | *** Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it. |
Revision as of 20:23, 25 April 2011
Net-SNMP Meeting
2011-04-25
2011-04-25
Previous: | 2011-03-21 |
Next: | 2011-05-? |
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2011-04-25.
Date and Time: 2011-04-25 19:00 UTC
Agenda
- Next Meeting
- May 23rd is chosen
- Releases
- 5.3.4
- 5.4.4
- pre2 still due out, will get out this week
- 5.7
- pre1 will go out late next week
- trunk test 115 is broken
- bvanassche will try and get win32 patches in for new standard mibs done
- Branch Life Times
- Policy should have been discussed on the list by now
- How long to keep older versions up to date, given a faster release cycle
- every other branch is LTS?
- back porting stable features to LTS branches
- Long Term Support (LTS)
- 5.4 and 5.7 are nominated for long-term and agreed upon
- Dave notes 5.4 came out in 2006.
- indecision on how long LTS releases should stay around
- resources are the real constraint: people, hardware and bug tracking make LTS support hard
- will bring back to a future meeting to continue discussion
- 5.4 and 5.7 are nominated for long-term and agreed upon
- Policy should have been discussed on the list by now
- Administrative
- standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
- Wes should write up a wiki page.
- Wes has not done so as of yet
- SVN vs GIT
- Should be deciding this month about whether to switch
- Good material on a good work flow process is in gitworkflows(7)
- A very good diagram depicting a slightly different model
- What to do with the historic tags/branches from SVN?
- Release script: Wes promises to update it
- It is a mental hurdle to switch, so those promoting git will help to help those less familiar
- Need to look at the web front end to ensure it displays things properly
- a deal breaker for dts12
- The vote: on a scale of -1 to 1, 1 being convert to git and -1 being fully against....
- hardaker: 1
- magfr: .1
- rstory: 1
- dts12: Decent web interface: 0.8 - Crap web interface: -0.3
- bvanassche: 1
- Will convert in roughly a month; after 5.[34].4 are out and before 5.7
- standardizing "please write to the list" notes? Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
- Technical
- IETF Notes from March IETF
- The EMAN working group is working on energy management (battery, power, etc)
- HOST-RESOURCES-MIB update interest, send notes of broken things in the MIB to Wes.
- Windows Builds
- Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it.
- IETF Notes from March IETF
- Round Table
- hardaker: enhanced notification support for the agent, converting to git, and 5.7
- dts12: 5.[34] releases and windows builds.