Difference between revisions of "Template:FAQ:Compiling 03"

Revision as of 19:34, 2 April 2008

This has been seen in a number of guises over the years - most commonly on Linux systems (although the problem may also occur elsewhere). A typical installation may not always include the full set of library links required for building the Net-SNMP software.

This problem can usually be fixed by installing the missing packages (typically the development version of a package that is already there).

Examples of this that we have come across include:

    -lelf       elfutils-devel      (later renamed to elfutils-libelf-devel)
    -lbz2       bzip2-devel
    -lselinux   libselinux-devel
    -lcrypto    openssl/openssl-devel
    -lbeecrypt  libbeecrypt/beecrypt/beecrypt-devel.

These are the names of the RedHat/Fedora RPMs. Other distributions or O/S's may use different names, but the basic idea should be the same.

If the compilation is complaining about a missing .so file, then an alternative quick fix is to add the missing symbolic link, using something like:

         ln -s libelf.so.1 /usr/lib/libelf.so
 

giving the appropriate generic library name from the error message, and the correct number for whichever version of this library you have installed.

If the compilation is complaining about a .la file, then you should install the relevant development package, as listed above.